By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Riot Of The Blood said:
fkusumot said:
 

Uhm, SSBB isn't a online shooting game. I see you're trying to defend your assertion about FPS's. So what is your beef with SSBB getting a 9.5... have you even played it yet?

Of course I have not played it; the game isn't even out yet.

As for my "beef" with the games score: 9.5 is a score you give to a monster game—a game that's so great it defines an entire generation. I'm talking about games like Super Mario 64, Zelda: OOT, or Resident Evil 4. Based on my prior experience with the Smash Brothers franchise, I simply can not put the game in that category. A 9.5 is, for me, probably what you would consider a 9.8-10 to be. I have my dooubts that this game is that good. That's all. I need to play it and see for my self.

I have not played a game for niether the Playstation 3, Xbox 360, or Nintendo Wii that I would give a 9.5 to. Zelda Wii would be the closest thing, but it's a bit dated.


Well, what you originally said was:

Riot Of The Blood said:
9.5 is the type of score you give to games like Super Mario 64 or Resident Evil 4, not stuff like Bioshock or Smash Brothers.

You categorically said that the score was not deserved. That's a stealth troll. You haven't played the game. It's not even out yet except in Japan. Hey, I gave you an example of a better way to do it.

If a 9.5 is the score a game so great it defines a generation should get then Wii Sports should have got a 9.5, but I've never seen you have a beef with the much lower score that it got.