The OP is actually a moderately interesting read even if I don't know enough tech speak to be able to determine if it's simply a logical presentation of factually incorrect information.
The Wii U needs at least one stellar looking game before we can get a feel for how much the differences in hardware are born out in the end product. It's had good-looking games (e.g. Pikmin 3) but nothing, I suspect, that has really pushed the hardware. At the end of the day, all analysis aside, the proof will be in the pudding.







