theprof00 said:
I haven't ignored a single thing you've said. I've corrected you. You corrected me on things I wasn't saying. I restated my point...over and over and over. You've danced around it, continuing an argument about something I didn't say. I call you on that, saying you're obviously not reading the thread because you're correcting me on things I'm not saying. You deny that, making implications that I'm a fanboy or that I can't understand your point because I'm blinded by bias. I pull out your posts again, showing how you're not ackowledging me. You proceed to quote someone else, saying that I said "MS is pulling the wool over our eyes", when I never said that...making this huge post about how I had an initial point and then swerved off into many other points that you were addressing. And you couldn't even point out these other points I was making. I point out how you are now confirming that you can't even keep track of what is being said. You say 'oh, you didn't say it but that doesn't matter'. So yeah...better luck painting someone else as a fanboy. Cuz you did a shit job with it against me.
I guess the only real thing you can argue, the only valid argument piece against my point, was that Sony may not have enough datacenters. This is the only valid argument against mine because my point was that MS doesn't actually need 300k servers for xb1. I proposed they could get by with far less, and I still believe that's true. Which stems right from my point that Sony doesn't need to have as much invested as MS to provide the service they are advertising...as opposed to MS who is advertising a whole lot more. You could argue that I simply don't know enough....which you have. But it still follows that Sony might have enough for what they need, evidenced by the fact that Gaikai already won many awards and has run well for two years already....on top of which that Sony has continued investing in it. So, unless you can prove that Sony's service is incompetant when it hasn't even released yet, there is really no further argument to be made.....unless we want to continue making theories and assumptions, which will simply end up as a waste of both of our time. |
@Bolded: Do you even hear yourself. You keep acting as if your point of view which is an opinion is somehow irrefutable. This is the theme of your over and over again opinion which boils down to "Well Sony could do anything we just don't know". "Sony could have enough servers, Sony could have enough datacenters". To swing around that same point I could say "Sony probably does not have enough servers, Sony probably donot have enough datacenters" both are the same type of argument. So what eactly are you basing your opinion on. Where is this confidence that Sony has what it takes to bring a solid quality of service to the Gaikai platform. Can you provide any type of evidense that Sony just "Have enough to do the job". Right now, all I get from you is that Sony might be able to do something. I would consider that a very weak argument to stand on if thats all you can provide.
I have given a clear list of advantages that MS has within the cloud space to support their streaming service. I have listed why I believe they have enough infrastructure to provide a good quality of service. There is tons of examples and links I have provided for my opinion.
