| Option- said: Titanfall looks stunning but it isn't an exklusive. It was lent by EA for MS's presentations because of their partnership (we all know that these two switch their chairs regularly). I accept the entertainment argument although I'm sure the PS4 will provide a similar experience. And i want to ask you something: Why are you defending policies which aim to sneek more and more in your private life? This industry should be mainly about games and having fun. I think the videogame industry is one of the most "innocent" industry, because there are mostly educated people into it. The companies want to earn money, but they don't walk over corpses like others (see Nestle, BP, walmart low wages etc). Thats actually really calming and should be defended and not destroyed by anti-consumer decisions. So why are you and others defending these steps of MS? I don't want no fighting or dissing, just a rational discussion. We're all gamers and want vaguely the same: good times with our prefered console or other device. |
maybe because the article even stated that this would be only an option for people who would want to be part of this kind of advertisement program?
why won't you allow some consumers to be part of a new kind of personalized advertisement if they want this? are you the guy who defines what everyone has to want? do you also want to tell everyone with a smartphone that he has to pay for every game even if he can play them for free if he accepts to get the game with advertisement?
