Rumor: Microsoft’s Cloud based streaming service is called “Rio”

[Machiavellian]

Subie_Greg said:

Machiavellian said:

You made a claim but do not take the time to back it up.  Anyone can say someone doesnt know what they are talking about and have absolutly not clue themselves.  If you cannot prove my statements are false or inaccurate than you are playing the word game.  I was about to go and provide some links but though best to see if you actually know something different or just making empty statements.

So what is it, where am I wrong.  At what point during anything I stated is incorrect.  You made the claim so back it up.  

@Bolded - Can you find anything in my post where I make such a simple statement.  Did you reven read it.  I mention Azure infrastructure, I mention Azure platform and services, I mention Orleans which is a development platform to develop distributed Cloud based Applications.  I mention a hell of a lot more than a bunch of servers.  Maybe you need to go back a few steps as you clearly have no ideal what I stated.

2nd Bolded - I have stated a few times these are my opinion including the last one from your post.  There are things that are not opinion and thats the Azure and Gaikai service as it is today.  My assumptions on those results I have clearly stated is an opinion.  So I have no clue what you are talking about.

It's not whether you are or aren't correct. It's that you can't back up what you are saying. I can't make that an easier to understand

Pics or it didn't happen? Link or GTFO? You understand?

Ok here is just one thing you said

"Do you really think in a years time, Sony was able to reengineer the Gaikai service beyound what it is today.  If anything they spent that year getting the service able to stream PS3, PS1 and PS2 game and be lucky they have it integrated within PSN with no fuss."

^^^Again assumptions pushed as fact^^^

If you can't understand, then there is nothing I can do to help you sir

Now I understand.  You come into a thread say someone does know know something.  Cannot prove an ounce of your statement.  Cannot even use good old google like you did in another thread to back up your claim.  Are you afraid if you attempt so show anywhere that I am wrong you will only make yourself look foolish.  At least show one part of a statement I made that is wrong.  Why even say someone is ignorant if a subject if you are to ignorant to even know.  So I am calling you out.  If you know something than state it if not maybe you should just sit on the sideline.

Yes, its an assumption, can you even debate it or not.  I asked you a question, what is your thoughts or is it to much trouble for you.  Its the thread to complex or should I bring it down a level so you can understand.