insomniac17 said:
You are missing the point. Without Romo, the Cowboys are not in the game. The interception directly led to the loss, but he is the reason you were in a position to win at all. You can say that if the interception didn't happen, the Cowboys win. You could say that if Rahim Moore hadn't blown coverage against Baltimore in the playoffs, Denver would have won. But that's ignoring all of the other chances to make big plays that also didn't happen. The interception is the most visible play that led to the loss. But don't ignore all of the other ones that the Cowboys didn't make that contributed. |
I'm not missing the point at all. Romo doesn't throw the INT Dallas probably wins he threw it we lost that's the bottom line.
Edit: Your also focusing on a what if scenario if Dallas didn't have Romo.
