Dr.EisDrachenJaeger said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
the difference is that one is technically superior in its market but lacking good support while the other is technically behind in its market (if you consider it next gen) and also lacks good support for it.
As time goes on, I think vita will get better than the wii U will. WiiU will probably get worse since most of the third party games its getting now is because developers are scaling the games according to PS3/360. once next gen games stop releasing on ps3/360, most of them wont bother making a special version for wiiU, or nintendo will have to pay a premium for it which they wont for every multiplatform game....which still wont look as good as ps4/xb1
I still cant figure out how black ops declassified went so wrong on the vita (supposed to be what sells the vita, turned out to be lowest rated vita game on metacritic), and why despite vita's power and RAM, fifa is just a kit update (even on the 3ds).
on the bright side, we still havent seen big titles like GTA, god of war and gran turismo pushing the limits on the vita so theres still hope for that whereas the wiiU is already as good as it gets. |
So it wont get PS4/Xb1 games when its inexpensive to port to the machine and engines are scalable and the last gen stuff is all DX9 games?
Right. I swear some people dont think.
|
go to the monster hunter vita threads. according to most nintendo fans, ports cost a shit load of money and are not worth it. I didnt think because I assumed they were correct.
nah seriously, some games were made for PS2/PS3 and Xbox/360 but most of them eventually stopped appearing on the older systems. MGS4, GTA4, COD4, uncharted drakes fortune were PS3's greatest games at the beginning of its life, none were on PS2 despite its massive install base. some things just are not possible on old hardware.
