By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Frequency said:

You have news for me, you just don't have any actual facts to back up that news.

Mobile devices have a higher number of gamers

Mobile games even when free have a higher revenue stream

More people spend time playing games on average, on their mobile than on any other device.

All of these are facts backed up by virtually every study, poll and experiment conducted.

You you pretend mobile games aren't real games until you're blue in the face, doesn't detract from the stark fact that they are games and people that play them are gamers.

Hate to break it to you but a game is a game and a person that plays them is a gamer, there's no threshold to bring a gamer and there's no threshold to 'being a "proper" game'. Look at pong in the early days, its basic and yet people that played it are gamers.

 

Again people respond and completely ignore the facts and my statement of Nintendo trying to get a piece of the mobile gaming pie with the wiiu which you love so much.

 

If mobile gaming wasn't reaaaaly gaming, why would they try to penetrate that market, and if mobile gaming isn't really gaming why would you support Nintendo's endeavours to get a piece of that pie?

 

In short, you and many of the other commenters in this thread are absolute hypocrites 

 

Oh and as for your retarded TV analogy, commercials are remembered by absolutely millions of people, for decades, people look back and talk about 'that old commercial about XXX or yyy' way to shoot yourself in the foot.

 

Last but not least how is having a firm grasp on reality and not being a biggot about who qualifies to be a gamer or not, in any way shape or form "going against nintendo" that alone shows that you are reacting in defence of Nintendo rather than reacting in a logical mature manner.

But hey, from a guy that thinks people who play mobile games "arent really gamers and that mobile games "arent really games what should I really expect?

 

It will be fun when hyper light drifter hits the wiiu, I guess you won't call that a game since the exact same game will be available for mobile too, and had been planned for development prior to the wiki version, eh?

Honestly, people these days lose their grip on reality just enough to suit their own needs


You either accept that you are wrong or agree to disagree.

Playing a few levels of angry birds doesn't make you a gamer no matter how many times you claim otherwise. Being a gamer means having gaming as a hobby, not the fact that you have played a free game on a "platform" you bought to do something totally different (call, write messages and browse Internet). I have played football and still do from time to time, yet I'm not a football player.

You think there is no treshold for being a true game? No difference? Try comparing FF XV and FF: All the Bravest.

Read this 100 times, maybe you'll start to understand why you keep being rejected:

Different demands, different quality, different experience, different targets ===> DIFFERENT MARKETS



Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!

My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/

My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.