jonathanalis on 06 October 2013
| fps_d0minat0r said: the difference is that one is technically superior in its market but lacking good support while the other is technically behind in its market (if you consider it next gen) and also lacks good support for it. As time goes on, I think vita will get better than the wii U will. WiiU will probably get worse since most of the third party games its getting now is because developers are scaling the games according to PS3/360. once next gen games stop releasing on ps3/360, most of them wont bother making a special version for wiiU, or nintendo will have to pay a premium for it which they wont for every multiplatform game....which still wont look as good as ps4/xb1 I still cant figure out how black ops declassified went so wrong on the vita (supposed to be what sells the vita, turned out to be lowest rated vita game on metacritic), and why despite vita's power and RAM, fifa is just a kit update (even on the 3ds). on the bright side, we still havent seen big titles like GTA, god of war and gran turismo pushing the limits on the vita so theres still hope for that whereas the wiiU is already as good as it gets. |
Bold 1: both sony and ms said ps3 and 360 would receive their games until 2016. witch will be almost all the lifetime of wii u,
Bold 2: we havent seen mario kart, ssb, 3d mario, dk and a new zelda, so theres much more hope for wii u, also ubisoft is hoping for it. they believe that the millions of people who bought the previous versions of these games would buy a wii u to play the next game.
