By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mensrea on 05 October 2013
Edit Thread
Zero999 said:
Mensrea said:
Zero999 said:

says galaxy was amazing in visuals but 3d world is lacking visually. I spot a contradiction here. and calling it rehashed, isn't that a popular word nowadays? look, no one cares if it's kinda similar to 3d land. people buy a game because of what it is and 3d world looks amazing in every department, overflowing with level design and fun gameplay. It will sell deserved gangbusters.


How the hell is that a contradiction? Galaxy has good visuals, and SM3DW has lazy visuals. I'm missing the "contradiction."

 

I do care that it's a 3D Land rehash. Sure it will be fun, but I expect much better than this from the first 3D Mario game on Nintendo's first HD system. 

"Oveflowing with level desgin...."

lol

visually, 3d world is leaps and bounds above galaxy, so caling galaxy great and 3d world lazy is a contradiction. call it a rehash to your heart's content, it won't change reality. mario is all about level design and 3d world is following the series footsteps with lot's of creativity.

Galaxy in HD on Dolphin looks better than 3D world. You clearly don't understand the meaning of the word contradiction. I mean, clearly you have no conception of what contradiction means: https://www.google.com/search?q=contradiction+definition&oq=contradiction+definition&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.3767j0j1&sourceid=chrome&espvd=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 there is a definition.

 

3D world has lazy ass visuals. Bland aptly describes it. Not everyone has to agree with your opinion, so stop attacking mine.