Chrizum said:
DucksUnlimited said:
Chrizum said:
DucksUnlimited said:
Chrizum said:
DucksUnlimited said:
Seece said:
Surely that's subjective? I mean even if he's narrowing it down to how the system works, MS have a better track record for OS software than Sony ... |
"Surely that's subjective?"
*follows with subjective statement
|
Oh come on you're not seriously suggesting Sony has an equal or better track record than Microsoft? What kind of OS does your PC run, CellOS?
|
I don't think you know what subjective means.
|
Right... In a strict sense, sure, the word "better" is always subjective. But unless you can come up with some decent arguments, it's obvious to any sane person that Microsoft has a superior track record concerning operating systems. I mean come on. What has Sony done in this field that can even remotely compare to Windows? Even Sony would admit Microsoft has the advantage here.
|
I agree completely that Microsoft is better with OS's. Doesn't make it any less subjective or his post any less hilariously ironic.
|
My point is that it's not a matter of opinion. Microsoft is known for their OS's. Sony is not. You're overstating the irony is what I'm saying. Oh well. It's a silly argument to begin with.
|
Not a matter of opinion? Sorry, but yes it is. Being popular opinion doesn't make it fact. Apparently you're still struggling with this concept. Don't worry though, you're certainly not the first person I've seen on this site having that issue.
If one, brief, tongue-in-cheek post is overstating, your judgment on the matter is kind of fucked up.
