Machiavellian said:
Its interesting that no one on GAF trust this guy because if you read the stuff he has reported, he leaves the opinion part out and just give the details or ask the questions. This article is a prime example. No opinion parts really, just questions and letting the engineers tell their story. I find the article a very interesting read since it gives a good understanding of MS design decisions. |
If I remember rightly, these two articles are why he was banned from GAF:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-can-xbox-one-multi-platform-games-compete-with-ps4
Which was a horrible attempt at comparing the graphics chips in both machines. His choice of GPUs was flawed and he failed to mention ROPs in that article. It was amateurish at best.
and this one:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-ps3-system-software-memory
which was disproven by developers on Gaf and Twitter.
It only takes a couple of examples of incompetence to ruin your reputation it seems.
The headline on this article is a bit of spin, but I assume that was an editorial decision to get hits.








