CGI-Quality said:
pokoko said:
walsufnir said:
It *is* a big deal, literally. You don't care? Fine, I do. And why do you starting a question with an "if"-sentence?
To me the game is too big, I've said enough to this. You don't agree? Nice, I don't care. My point still stands, as we all don't know how big all parts are so 50GB would be ok: They could've done smaller.
|
That you're comparing the size of next gen games to last gen games, which were almost always severely restricted in content because they had to fit on last gen consoles?
It's a massive file size, no doubt. Personally, there is no way I could DL that. However, that you went into attack mode immediately, without even knowing what is going to be the norm for next gen games of this type, without even knowing how much of that is required, doesn't seem logical.
|
Exactly, those comparisons to Crysis 3 were silly. Yes, on a high-end PC, you'd be hard-pressed to find a better looking game right now (save Metro: Last Light), but Killzone is 100% next gen, and closer to the original Crysis in scope.
I don't expect much issue with the file size, though. Gone are the nap causing days of PS3 installs.
|
It's funny that people don't realize that alot of last gen games were reusing textures most of the time and that is what led to the small game sizes. Games like rage practically don't reuse textures very often and the funniest thing is that it clocks in at 20GB while having mediocre textures at the same time.
