Nem said:
darkknightkryta said:
Don't worry Nem, last time I'm going to respond, I'm just to "testa duro"(hard headed), as my parents say in Italian, to leave this be; so don't hate me XD.
But yes, the reason this debate is going in circles is because your 100% ignoring everything I've brought to you. I've explained on multiple times that your theory on ad-hoc party doesn't hold any merit because the execs in Japan hold final say. This is the reason Sony is in the mess that it's in, this is also the reason that Ad-hoc party would have been fixed within an hour of a phone call from Capcom if Monster Hunter was truly at stake. Your other theory about reaching a larger audience, by putting Monster Hunter with Nintendo exclusive doesn't hold. In Japan it does, but not elsewhere. So to reach the "global audience" as you're trying to say would involve a PS360 multiplat title. Hell even the Vita has a higher install base and has been consistently outselling the Wii U, so by that token it has a higher global audience and should have gotten a port of 3G. This didn't happen and everything Capcom says about this exclusiveness for Nintendo contradicts every statement they make, as I've pointed above. Poor reasoning over ad-hoc party which I've essentially debunked with emperical data, PR statements from Capcom which contradicts other PR statements from Capcom, show that ad-hoc party wasn't the case. The big thing that makes all the pieces fit is that Nintendo paid good money, or made a very nice deal for Capcom.
|
Hehe... i dont agree at all.
As i said, your theory makes sense to you and my theory makes sense to me. You are extrapolating things as empirical evidence that are not in my view. Wether MH is exclusive to one platform has nothing to do with the fact that the next game might be in a different platform. Wii U is indeed the logical step for the global strategy cause Sony wasnt an option (because of the ad-hoc fallout) and Xbox is not accepted in Japan. In my opinion, there was no other choice, and while you say it could've been solved with a phone call, the fact is it wasnt and theres no way we can know it would be at the time. But again, i know you will disagree with that. I dont want the guys here to be bothered by our constant bickering on the subject. xD
|
No! No! No! (Daniel Bryan reference here). Seriously though; cool beans.
