Emily Rogers: “Wii U Owners Better Buy Ubisoft Games”

[Cobretti2]

oniyide said:

Cobretti2 said:

pezus said:

curl-6 said:

It's still gimping to give one version of a game unequal treatment. They treat Wii U owners like second classs citizens and then wonder why their games don't sell to Nintendo gamers.

Batman will be $10 cheaper on WiiU though. Let's see if that neutralizes the gimping. 

not in aus. ontop of that, we don't get the two special editions so why woudl I buy it on Wii U when I can get the nice cool limited edition on PS3.

you wouldnt.

but i have a general question. If someone has a PS3 or 360 even, why complain. they already have access to the version they want. The only people who should be complaining are Wii u owners outside the US who want to play Batman and judgint by the sales id say aint a lot of them

Well the first one did some neat little things with the gamepad.  So it would come down to those features or the PS360 version. However when you can tell the publisher isn't even trying with their release packages and/or it is missing online (personally I don't care) it just is doomed to failure from the start as a lot of those one console owners take things way too personally.

Rayman Legends is a good example of this, the delay killed the game. Ubisoft become the enemy of the Nintendo core for that mess. Most of them didn't stop to think, well hang on in return Ubisoft annouced, splinter cell, ACIV and Watch Dogs. To me a short delay is a fair trade off for getting decent support on your system of choice.

Once Ubisosft ends WIi U support people without a doubt will group them with EA lol.