Mythmaker1 said:
If there isn't any tangible evidence to suggest such, I find that uncalled for. |
It became apparent years ago. Everything he says companies should do would help third parties and hurt first parties or consumers.
Sony is losing money on every PS3 sold and selling at a slow pace? Solution: Drop the price so they lose more money. The unspoken implication is so that third parties can sell more games at he expense of Sony. This was when Sony was estimated to be losing around $100 on each PS3.
Nintendo is making a ton of money and breaking sales records with the Wii? Solution: Release an HD Wii so they can get the same games the the 360 and PS3. Because a single standard is more profitable for third parties. It is cheaper to make games for just one system instead of three or more. Keep in mind this was 2008!
Third parties not making enough money? Solution: Grab more money from your customers by instituting online passes and release a lot more DLC. Oh, hello EA, I see you did this exact thing for a while.
All are actual suggestions by Pachter. There are a ton more that I don't remember. The guy seems to act like he has no understanding of the market, but he can't really be that stupid. His real goal is to pump up the positions of the people he is being paid to represent. He is not making money doing internet shows. His real money comes from Wedbush Securities.
Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic
Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)
PC - Command & Conquer Remastered Collection (1995/1996/2020)







