mutantclown said:
RolStoppable said:
Kresnik said:
forest-spirit said:
I doubt that Splinter Cell will be a deciding factor for Ubisoft's future support considering how bad it did overall. Rayman Legends on the Wii U did well compared to PS3 and 360 versions, the question there is whether or not combined sales are enough to warrant another Rayman game on any platform.
Watchdogs and Assassin's Creed IV on the other hand will be very important. As far as I know neither will be gimped in any way for the Wii U so there won't be any excuses for disappointing sales. If you want more of that content on Wii U you'll have to get those games. |
@ bold, we've already seen the excuse for that in this very thread. "Ubisoft treated Nintendo poorly in the past therefore why should why buy their games?" Should Watch Dogs & AC4 bomb, I suspect it'll rise up again.
|
Then let's get this out upfront: Ubisoft's games suck, period. When they release games like AC3 that require a day 1 patch, then they are clearly not meeting the standards a Nintendo console owner has come to expect. I mean, it's a bit nonsensical to assume that equality is the bar that has to be met when the quality standards for Ubisoft games lack in general. Equally poor is still poor.
|
I had to LOL at this.
|
Nobody an argue with it though. Their games are always well made. Every freaking time, almost no bugs and no day one patches.
