By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian on 29 September 2013
Edit Thread
ethomaz said:

Machiavellian said:

Yeah, you should read the article if you are going to use it as proof.  I did.  There is no hint, the article says and only says animation.  Nothing about poly count or even just the character alone.  Context is a big issue with me when someone makes a statement.  Either you stay in context or you have no proof of your claim besides an opinion.

I already even quoted the text that says that from that link in this thread... if you can't read... sorry but I won't help you.

I read perfectly well, I am questioning your ability to understand context.  You make a claim that Crytek stated they have the most advance character, and you use the poly count as a reference.  The link you provided states, they have the most advance animation.  The two are not the same.  If you are stating the two are the same then it is I who is sorry.  I understand if English is not your native language but even in other languages context makes a big difference.

You made a claim but still have not backed it up.  Now it appears you are trying to be above your statement.  If you cannot find a link that supports your claim then just say so and move on.  Throwing out fluff statements will not support your claim.  You have not proven your claim and thats pretty much where I stand.  You can just ignore this post if you cannot find proof and I will let it drop.