| SxyxS said: @darknight waste your money on sly4(you can even play a darkknight there),great game and Escape plan(better take a first look as it is very special) |
I have Sly4 already.
Dragon Quest 1-10-8 was paid for by Nintendo is my hunch. Why? Cause Dragon Quest 1-6 could, and should, have been ported to iOS. iOS being Square's current focus since, you know, almost every 2D FF game is on it. Which is also why Monster Hunter 4 is on 3DS only which is what I'm arguing. Monster Hunter Frontier is a PC game, the 360 game is a few years removed port of that title, you do realize that?
@Nem
Do you honestly think Capcom wouldn't have gone to SEAJ and say "Monster Hunter 4 is going to 3DS only if you don't fix ad-hoc party"? I can assure you every single programmer at SEAJ would have stopped whatever they were doing and updated Ad-hoc party. Even if SCEA was being stubborn, SCEAJ can override anything they do. And what are you missing about my point about Monster Hunter 3G? When Capcom was asked about no Wii U version of Monster Hunter 4 they said Monster Hunter games need to be exclusive which is why there's only a 3DS version. They actually said that at a 3G event. Monster Hunter 3G: Multiplatform, Monster Hunter needs to be exclusive, see the contradiction? It's like doing a proof of 2=1 and ignoring the divide by zero. Resident Evil Revelations sold well on the 3DS, almost a million. There was a handheld market for it; Capcom wanted more. Hell, considering how bad those ports have sold, think the Vita version wouldn't atleast sell as well as the PS3 version? PS3 to Vita and vice versa ports are very easy and require very few people and time. The money coming in greatly offset the cost of the port. Plain and simple, it's lost money for them not to have made a Vita version. Which goes back to the handheld contract Capcom must have signed which most likely expired at Monster Hunter 4s release.
