nitekrawler1285 said:
Even so Sony is gouging you to play titles you already paid to rent. Those games are not free in the strictest since. Higher margin purchases should be subsized. At least they would have happy publishers. That means more titles. They need a 250 model with 64 GB and a game probably a high quality ps+ title or let you pick from a variety. They would only be subsidizing the card at that price. |
Like how MS gouges you to play games online for games you already paid for? 80m sold.
Like Nintendo gouges you for peripherals to play games on a system you already own? 30m wiifits sold.
Look. If you're looking to make a negative out of a situation, we can play that all day.
At the end of that day, the important thing is getting customers to buy the system. They need a reason. Currently, the Vita doesn't have that raison d'etre. It will help when ps4 is out and it can stream your games on the go. Sure. That's a good reason, but it's niche toward consumers who already own a ps4.
Giving away a 64gb card and a AAA ps+ title at 250$ is ridiculous. You're thinking far too "inside the box". Your proposition is to take a bigger Razorblade cost and give more value. The mainstream, and to a lesser extent the core, do not care. Not one bit. Vita JUST had a pricecut in both system and cards. Did it help? Barely.
What needs to be said to get it through people's heads that it's not memory cards or system price? It's the motivation to buy that is missing. PERIOD. Feel free to continue arguing, but you're wrong.
