By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DucksUnlimited on 24 September 2013
Edit Thread
Zero999 said:
DucksUnlimited said:
Zero999 said:

killzone and infamous weren't announced as ps3 exclusives many years before. and if people aren't upset because of those, why would they be upset about bayonetta 2 on wii u?

Because PS3 owners are generally going to be far more willing to buy a PS4 than a Wii U. That's like saying that if Nintendo fans weren't upset about ZombiiU being on Wii U instead of Wii, then they shouldn't be mad if something like X had been confirmed as a PS4 exclusive. If you don't see the difference here then I don't know what to tell you.

difference? i don't see the resemblance. what did you try to say exactly? You could try reading it to find out.

nintendo fans not upset about zombi U on wii u instead of wii? WHY SHOULD THEY BE? When did I say they should be? I don't think you comprehend the idea of dealing in hypotheticals.

I think you clearly didn't get the point of this discussion. we are talking about a game that was announced as ps3 exclusive and ended up not coming to ps3 at all. that is something to be pissed about, even for the ones who want a ps4. Why? For what conceivable reason could a PS4 owner or someone who intends to get a PS4 be upset that a FFXV is coming to PS4 instead of PS3? Better graphics and performance? and yet, people from the ps3 audience complain about having to buy another hardware to play bayo 2, a game that was never announced for ps3. Again, this is because it's coming to a Nintendo console, which many PS360 owners had no intention of buying. They found out that they're going to have to pay $350 to play a game that would have only cost $60 if it came out for a console they already had or intended to get. This is the most obvious thing in the world yet you're still somehow struggling with it.