richardhutnik said:
The basis of my original post was trying to follow the original argument people were making in the other thread that the Wii U wasn't selling, because the software that sells hasn't been out. To that, if what they say is true, why did Nintendo include the second screen? Conclusion here is to either then say that there has to be something with the second screen Nintendo has failed to make compelling for people thus far, and it isn't just software alone. So, when people are saying the Wii U isn't selling because of the lack of compelling software, they are off. It isn't selling because of a lack of compelling software that argues the case for the second screen being essential. But, I left it open for people to end up arguing other ways if they like. |
Oh, you're mind was already made up. You concluded it was a failure, that the touch gui is useless feature nobody wanted, and no games can solve the way you see things. This thread was to convince ppl of your opinion and be a forum to exchange ideas. That's alright. Though, I thought you wanted to be convinced of the merits of the gamepad, but you have repeated the point of your op to me twice when I tried to show you the merits. Well carry on then your thread (not able to convince you) will convince others who come in with an open mind.
