Is socialism endan^gered in The United States?

[fatslob-:O]

MDMAlliance said:

sc94597 said:

MDMAlliance said:

fatslob-:O said:
I say cut costs everywhere not just on social care but on everything that is a drain oh and the unemployment numbers are steadily growing so no more welfare.

 

Just wondering, are you saying you're fine with just cutting spending and, as a result, leaving many more problems politically for the sake of economics?  I know many people don't know or understand, but there are many consequences to cutting in any department.  The severity of the consequences vary, but cutting from everywhere will stir up a shit storm.

The cuts would be incremental, just as the increase in spending was/is incremental. 

Just wondering... is it really possible to cut spending in a non-incremental way besides completely getting rid of it?  What I say still stands, because he wanted to cut costs on everything.  If you cut too little from everything, it does nothing.  The only logical conclusion that a chunk would be taken off where it would be noticeable.  If you do that, you create a big problem.  Why do you think it's so hard to change our budget?

The way I see it now, we're only bleeding money so it makes sense to cut alot of costs and expenses while lowering taxes too so that congress doesn't abuse it by increasing their own paychecks. :P