forethought14 said:
No it's not, Jaguar is an upgrade from Bobcat, still within the same architectures, just enhanced with 15% higher efficiency, 4-cores instead of 2, more cache, and several other enhancements. Nothing completely different, and nothing life-changing. 70? I've heard 115GFLOPS, and googling the CPU gives me 115GFLOPS..... PS4/X1 Can pull off 100 GFLOPS with 8 or 6 cores? 2 cores are reserved for the OS just so you know.... What does that have to do with anything? Architectures of Xenon and Cell are different compared to Espresso. PS360 are based on a G5 design (terrible design), while Espresso is based on a G3, not the same family at all. FLOPS comparisons aren't comparable at all either. If that's the case, then explain to me how YOU think a 15GFLOP Espresso can even hope to run games as well as 115GFLOPS CPUs like Xenon? Most of your edits are "Lolololo look how weak it is" type of posts. And I'm still waiting for you to explain to me why the figures of Espresso and Jaguar are that close, yet Espresso apparently has "much worse" SIMD? |
@Bold here's where your wrong, Jaguar features wider SIMD units as evidenced by its AVX extension while also having wayyy more than 2 cores.
Can I like also get some source on how those cores are based off of a G5 please ?
Developers probably have strip some workloads for the wii u processor to get it running. How do you think developers got games running on older consoles ? BTW the CPU isn't all important for purposes of of rendering today.
can you like show some evidence as to the figures for JAGUAR AND NOT BOBCAT are close to the espresso.
BTW those were comparisons Whether you like it or not I can still accept the fact that it has a weak cpu plus I'm seriously worred about the WII U in the future unless ofcourse nintendo drops support easily.
