-CraZed- said:
You are very much correct. I personally like to look at both from a real world view. In the United States we have so much available food because of Capitalism and the advent of the low profit margin Supermarket that we now measure hunger with terms like 'food insecurity' and 'food deserts' etc. In other countries they where real hunger is present they still measure starvation as an example. My point is that most people would prefer to be poor in the United States over any other place on Earth. To be poor in a capitalist country > poor or even middle class in any other country. |
In Brazil we have a program called "Fome Zero" (Zero Hunger)... and If we compare the poor in rich country to middle class in poor country it's obvious which is better... and there is studies about how much better a poor people have it today than rich people along the eras...
And in Cuba they make line to buy toilet paper, and in Russia you had to wait several years to buy a car.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."