| burninmylight said: resort to ad hominem attacks, like you did with Hibern81. |
Uh huh.... kinda like....
"Given your lack of knowledge about customer rights, your inability to put things in context and your terrifying logic regarding privacy, I can see why you are no longer a manager."
And just to really drive my point about the business card do you think it's a legit argument if these situations happen:
Someone asks to borrow car keys with the intent on "trying to impress a girl" and they drive it and hit another car. Your insurance company calls up and you explain to them, "Well, i didn't really think he was going to drive it. I just thought he was going to sit in it and look cool"
Or
Someone asks to borrow your gun for the purpose of "intimidating someone who bullies them." The guy shoots and kills someone and the cops come to interogate you and you explain, "Well, I really only thought he was going to show people he had a gun. I didn't think he would actually use it to send a projectile exploding out of the barrel"
Basically, when something is used for it's purpose you can't claim you didn't expect that to be used for it's purpose. That is closer to a contradiction than anything she did.
So, I correct you about being required to give out your last name... I point out your hypocrisy. I show the contradiction is his actions.... but I'm the one being stubborn... hmm.... okay
