Legend11 said:
Turkish said:
Legend11 said:
There's just a bunch of clowns arguing against what Albert said. I really get a kick out of the ones demanding to know what the PS4's CPU final clock rate is for example when looking at his numbers yet they had no problems with the people that basically pulled "40%" or "50%" performance difference between the two consoles out of the air without knowing the final clock rates for either of them. There's been so much FUD spread and eager fanboys eating it up because it's what they wanted to hear.
|
Amongst those "clowns" are engineers who flat out call him out on his bullshit. According to Albert the 360 has more bandwith than Xbox one. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=80953213&postcount=224
|
He ran his current facts by someone at the company that has a very indepth knowledge of the console. As for those engineers could you provide a link where they benchmarked the Xbox One along with a picture of the development unit in their possession? Yeah I thought so.
|
Its pretty much known that the 360 has more bandwidth with its EDRAM than the X1 ESRAM. Are there people on Gaf really arguing about that. Here is the bandwidth for the 360 EDRAM. Not sure why people take comments from people on Gaf as if they know what they are talking about. You get like one person out of hundred most times.
the EDRAM resides on the same package, and has a wide bus running at 2GHz to deliver 256GB/sec of bandwidth. That’s a true 256GB/sec, not one of those fuzzy counting methods where the 256GB is “effective” bandwidth that accounts for all kinds of compression.
