Max King of the Wild said:
Your backwards logic is really something. First off calling out a subset is a logical fallacy because its disingenuous to my statement. Second, your analogy isn't even comparable to the events in question. Third, writing someone off as a hypocrite is a logical fallacy. And finally, in order for me to be a hypocrite like you claim I need to fulfill certain criteria to meet the definition. One of those criteria is that I need claim to have higher standards... which I don't do. I simply explain exactly whats been happening recently. It also needs to be "more than is the case" but you admitted earlier that my post is in fact in line with reality and thus is the case. You are beat. Give up. |
I'm going to have to break this down for you to properly understand, because it seems like you're having difficulties here:
Predicate 1: Your statement was "See, the difference is the x1 fans are stretching, reaching, assuming and speculating. The opposing side is just making them aware that wishful thinking doesnt make it true. " Do you or do you not agree with this?
Predicate 2: Given this, you are, of course, on the opposing side, no? Keep in mind that I do read over the posting history of quite a few people, and I could post some examples of your stance if I disagree with your answer to this.
Predicate 3: Are you or are you not a fan of Sony? Once again, can easily grab relevant posting history to prove my point..
If you answered yes to all of these, then we can move on:
"One of those criteria is that I need claim to have higher standards... which I don't do"
Your claim that the other side (which you have inocrrectly labeled as x1 fans) is "reaching, assuming and speculating" gives claim to the fact that their actions are below actions of what you would consider "acceptable", else you would not bring them up. However, if you do concede that, yes, Sony fans are just as guilty of reaching, assuming and speculating, then you'll have no problems of my claim of you as a Hypocrite.
"It also needs to be "more than is the case" but you admitted earlier that my post is in fact in line with reality"
The outcome of whether this rumor turns out to be true or not is irrelevant. You cannot accuse a group of doing something that your group is just as guilty of doing WITHOUT being a hypocrite. If you cannot agree with that, then I'm afraid that it's your concept of logic that requires some serious overhaul.
Do you want to keep going? I have no problems with exposing your hypocrisy even further...
