CGI-Quality said:
fordy said:
CGI-Quality said:
I would advise you to read the edit, since it wasn't ever an argument of mine. You asked to explain what 4D was, and from memory, I did, in addition to giving you a source. To understand your own stuff, you need to, first, understand what 4D means in a given space. This post proves that you don't. And try not to be so condescending, it's not helping you make any points.
|
Explanation != Condescending. Believe me, I could milk it out a lot more. You make it very easy...
I've read the link, and it does not explain ONE thing about 4D. Raindrops on decaying wood is represented on a state machine the exact way that I told you, by storage of a previous state's relevant data to produce the next state. That data EXISTS in the same point in time, as what happens on an ideal state machine. Of course, if you're talking about 4D on a non-ideal state machine, then ALL CPUs do that, so why would it be bragged about?
|
The only thing you've milked are irrelvant comments that have done nothing but expose an undermining, personal agenda. Where it's time to cut ties to this convo - when one side refuses to accept things they don't want to hear. You haven't aided some good cause with your tirades, but, you have, most definitely, been condescending.
But, go with it.
|
Let's take the religious defense here, then? The PS3 has 4D, and unless somebody DISPROVES it appropriately, then it does!
Sorry, the onus is on the CLAIMANT, not the sceptic. Linking a page about raindrops on decaying wood (which can be prefectly matched on any other system out there) does little to prove your point.
But sure, walk off thinking you've proven something...it does wonders with self-dignity
