dsgrue3 said:
Slimebeast said:
Do I insult you in every post? I felt the need to call you out. Your hostile attitude is tiresome, I need to address that for everyone to see.
I do not refuse to respond to inquires. How many times do I have to explain that? If I appear to deflect, it is for a good reason: for clairty's sake or because of a misunderstanding, or for timing or some other reason. These discussions are complex. Misunderstandings happen easily. Look at the length of these posts at the end of this thread! On top of that I am a foreigner, it takes much longer and much more energy to write a post, explain something or express something than it does for native English people.
You constantly feel the urge to categorize your opponent, call him names. Stop trying to paint me into a box. It's pathetic. You play a dirty game making these claims about your opponents.
"oh, look how the theist deflects", "look how he hit and runs", "look how he is delusional". "look how he changes topic when he is losing the argument". "oh, look he is ignorant", "he is irrational", "he shouldn't discuss", "I feel utter disrespect and discontempt for such people" "look like he is resorting to insults when he is losing argument".
Trying to win a discussion by carrying the opponent in the dirt. Constant name calling. Those accusations and descriptions are unnecessary and incorrect. It's cheap behaviour.
If you are such a superior intellect, why do you have to resort to such low behaviour?
Don't you pretend for a second that I don't know your type and the psychology of your mind. You are a cliché.
In Swedish there's a term for being "objective" in discussions. Unfortunately I can't find a single, corresponding word in English but it means that in serious discussions you are expected to stay on topic not just formally, but in all respects. If you make snide remarks and sneaky insults your are not on topic, you are not objective in a discussion.
|
I challenge you to find a single time I've insulted you or called you a name. This should be entertaining, you're in for a rude awakening because I've not done this. You feel as though I have because you continually embarrass yourself by speaking from a position of ignorance.
8 paragraphs of the same thing...work on concision.
|
"This post was hilarious to me for how inept it was."
"Guess when you're blinded by one side, you can't see the overlapping stupidity. By the way, the word is "illogical"."
"This is why no rational person can take your type seriously."
"I'll just sit here in total bewilderment as to how this is "grounded in logic". Heh."
"Maybe you should stop pretending to know anything about logic and simply admit you know very little about anything."
"People who are flustered often lose the ability to think. I think you have demonstrated this multiple times now. Answer my questions and address the points I make or piss off."
"You should be able to read and respond accordingly, not go off on mindless rants about something never argued."
"Either you are incapable of doing so, or you have realized how delusive you seem and do not want to further emphasize the inanity of your assertions."
"...before spewing vitriolic nonsense...then again it's all you seem to bring to the table"
"You need to stop thinking you know things, because you clearly do not. Next time do your due diligence and save both of us some time."
"I'm actually astonished BMaker has entertained you for as long as he has."
- - - - - -
What's the purpose of statements like that other than attempts to discredit, insult and diminish? How does that further a discussion?
You think your aggressive tone promotes your agenda, gives more weight to your claims. It doesn't.
