UPDATE: Killzone: Mercenary Currently a 78 On Metacritic (Not a 77)

[Ajescent]

curl-6 said:

Ajescent said:

curl-6 said:

kupomogli said:

I'm not really a fan of FPS games, but for gameplay, other than the amount of players, 4v4 instead of 6v6 or 5v5 on consoles, the gameplay is a bit better than most CoD or CoD clones I've played. Atleast Warzone, which is all I've played.  Not as good graphically as on the PS3, but the graphichs do look nice as well.

I don't think anyone in their right mind expects Killzone 3 graphics on a handheld.

According to this thread, a lot do.

p.s

I wasn calling reviewers who haven't picked up on facts stupid not anyone specifically.

I think it's less about "console graphics" down to the pixel, more about an overall "console experience". They hold it to a PS3 standard of production value, gameplay style, content, etc.

Even then, common sense should come into play. No matter what Sony or anyone tries to tell you, a handheld will not give you the exact level of experience a console will.

That should be obvious.