tbone51 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
tbone51 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Its never a no win mentality for Microsoft. The reason they joined the gaming industry was strictly to hold Sony down. If they can't theres no reason to stay. I saw a documentary about the Xbox 360 after the loss of the Xbox and MS did not take losing to Sony very well. Their R&D department was hard at work trying to get the hardware out as quickly as possible.
I say Sony's marketshare will grow to 50% MS will have 35% and Nintendo will have 15%
|
ok so if ps4 sold 100mil, then X1 will have 70mil and WiiU 30mil..... seems that way as of now tbh! We'll see in the years to come!
|
Basically. My numbers would've been around 100(PS), 60(MS), Wii U (40). I am giving the Wii U the benefit of the doubt on their numbers, if they really get trampled then your numbers will do just fine.
|
1 thing about Nintendo is that their 1st party software sales are unmatched (thats 80%-90% games sold on each system that are 1st party i think). This is why if Nintendo joined with either M$ or Sony, that company is a guaranteed win o.O lol |
The death of Sega and the rise of Sony and Microsoft has forced me to this conclusion. Having first party is great, but having great thirty part completes the whole picture. Without proper third party you can lose at 2/6 to 4/6 of your potential market. This is why Sega could only sell 40 million consoles between two generations with the genesis and this is why the N64 and GC fell into a slump with shitty third party but awesome first party.
