Kasz216 on 04 September 2013
Ok, first off Nuclear weapons are totally worse then chemical weapons.
Second off, Both are greatly over hyped.
The effects of Nuclear weapons are greatly exaggerated and this was intentional as part of a cold war strategy to make sure they weren't used.
I mean hell, two have been used, and if you look at the scientific tests on them you find that no lasting effects were detectable outside of people in the blast area. Aka, no genetic damage for generations like some people believe, or even one generation. (Outside pregnant women, but pregnant at the time of the blast so i mean really, semantics.)
Chernobyl? Hardly any increase in actual cancer... except throat cancer from the people who drank contaminated milk and water.
