| spurgeonryan said: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/23/us-syria-attack-health-idUSBRE97M0HP20130823 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapon_of_mass_destruction
Shouldn't we send over 100,000 soldiers after bombing the Hell out of the area like we did in Iraq? Or does the U.S have nothing to gain this time, and no Corrupt President to push Congress to go for it? I mean..out of Fairness. If we attack one country just from rumors, then why not take any huge action with this? Can America really do one but not the other? Does it work that way? |
a) The Democrats are in charge, not the warmongers Republicans
b) DIck Cheney is not around. He instigated the entire Iraq war in order to secure a multi billion contract for Haliburton...like he did wiuth the first Gulf War. (This is not a conspiracy theory but actual fact. God knows why it is not more publicly talked about)
So yes, it is pretty much down to the President being sane and the VP having a soul.
