ethomaz said:
My post... http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5603723 I tried to explained what is hUMA (I never coded to a CPU/GPU with hUMA because it is a new thing in the industry). PS4 GPU does support hUMA at full state... MS did not support that because the eSRAM... the eSRAM is not coherent in Xbone and a hUMA enable system needs to have all shared coherent memory... so because the eSRAM MS was forced to create a new solution (based in hUMA? I don't know)... if that solution is better or not than hUMA I don't have the awnser because I don't even know if hUMA is that good but in terms of code you have a lot less to write with hUMA (better performance than a not shared memory? I think so). To make the thinkgs simples the Xbone use a difference memory system from everyting I already saw... Main DRAM pool: CPU/GPU shared memory coherence Xbone is a non-hUMA compilance... their solution is better than hUMA? I don't know. Are there any other comments that you have issue in that thread? |
You didn't answer my question.
Are you full of shit or do you purposefully troll the forums, knowing the correct answer but making statements contrary to what you know or believe just to create discord?
My problem isn't whether you in whatever capcity you have in whatever company you're in, know everything there is possibly to know, but that as someone in whatever capcity it is, has the ability to research the information out there, listen to what is being said by the parties involved, and capable of offering an honest answer or do you just default to trolling?
Because while you were nice enough to post that, you never attempted to support my argument that Microsoft could be doing any number of logical things, which you so conventiently did offer in this thread, but instead attempted to perpetuate the argument that Microsoft was mad and forced AMD to retract it's statement.
When the reality was, as I posted, that either AMD didn't actually know because Microsoft was the one who customized the chip OR they were under NDA so they couldn't talk about it.
I'm sick and tired of people saying "No, that's not true." and then offering absolutely no evidence to back it up, when someone else actually does some work.
Your post earlier is simply a slight of hand trick. You're not telling us what is wrong with the original post, you're just saying "See over here, I can do something similiar with this other thing." Great! He's not talking the frequency of the memory. If you just think he's wrong because you don't like what he's saying because it isn't technically accruate or you just don't like the Xbox One having a CPU speed of 1.9GHz, boo-hoo. Prove him wrong.
I'm not saying he's right. I'm not sure how the information he's referring to quite correlates to CPU frequency, but I'm not saying "No, that's not true." either. He's more of an expert in semi-conductors than I am. But because I'm not refuting him, because I'm not saying he's wrong, I don't have to sit here and actually offer something concrete someone else can follow to prove otherwise. You stuck your headout sir, and sorry if you caught my ire but I'm tired of people refuting something without any means of backing it up.
There are times when I respect your responses, despite not liking it, but there there are times like this when I get the impression you're full of it.
Just because you don't know, doesn't mean it isn't true. I'm beginning to think there is more that you don't know, but to save face you just BS.
Sorry for the rant, but my 2¢.
