By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dusk said:
dsgrue3 said:
It's far more likely that you're simply upset by their verdict than bias having occurred on their behalf.


I would generally agree, however I do find them biased. Especially with the example given of NFS for Wii U. I'll be the first to admit that I am a Nintendo/PC gamer, but if you watch the videos posted between the latest comparisons, the tearing of the screens is brutal! Even if the Wii U had slightly lower average FPS (odd considering Lens of Truth had is in the middle of the pack) it didn't have any tearing and a higher resolution than the other two. The real question is when a patch is released to fix the freezing issues, if they change their opinions or not. Also, they should attempt a download from the eshop comparison to see if it makes any difference. 


This is what I was thinking. Downloading from the eShop might as well improve load times.

As for their bias, I think they are a bit. But more importantly, I think that, despite their nifty tools for measuring framerates and what not, most of the time it seems like they don't know what they're talking about, throwing some "opinions" as "facts", and the people that go to their site, themselves not knowing much, take those "facts" as their bible.