is Digital Foundry biased?

[oni-link]

ListerOfSmeg said:
It does seem a bit odd they play down every positive and from the article its PC/PS3/360 vs Wii U alone rather than all compared to each other.
They also try really hard to make a difference of 5 FPS to 10 FPS at most seem like the difference in 30 FPS and 60 FPS.
Wii U drops to 25 PS3 360 drop to 30. That's not exactly as bad as they try to make it out to be.

Clearly there is a bias in the review but they had to give props to Nintendo in some areas even though you can tell they didn't want to..

Truth is its popular to hate on anything Nintendo and a lot of sites know this and act accordingly.
Not really any different then Gameinformer which cant talk about a Nintendo or MS game without making sure there is a negative in the article or a comparison to Sony. Its what their user base demands but in the end it will be what causes them to shut down much like Gamepro who spent their last 4 years catering to only 1 of 3 console fanbases.

Exactly, it's like they have writers who hates Nintendo but has to act as if they are un-prejudice because it's their job.  Plus I still think Ninja Blade is working for them especially how DF is still so stubborn on insisting the Wii U GPU is definitely a 4xxx based GPU instead of a totally diffrent GPU designed by Nintendo.