is Digital Foundry biased?

[ListerOfSmeg]

dsgrue3 said:

oni-link said:

dsgrue3 said:
It's far more likely that you're simply upset by their verdict than bias having occurred on their behalf.

It's not that...I would respect their review if it made sense.  However, most of their comparisons mostly mentions the deficiencies in Nintendo's version while downplaying their advantages.  Would it kill them to say that SC:Blacklist and Trine 2 was superior to their sub-HD counterparts?

They consider more things than just the image itself. If that's all you base your decision on, then you probably won't agree. They factor in many aspects including frame integrity, aliasing, etc.

They did conclude that Trine 2 looked better on Wii U so I don't understand what upsets you there. With SC it came down to whether you put an emphasis on visual beauty or integrity - if you prefer better textures with some tear then Wii U is not the best choice. If you prefer worse textures with no tear, then it is.

Hmm that is odd because when I read it or about it, the parts linked said in some areas the PS3 textures looked better and in some they looked better on Wii U. How this has turned into completely bad textures on Wii U is beyond me but anyone that can take something that says its good on both at times and turn it into its completely bad on one but not the other is clearly biased.