By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsgrue3 on 27 August 2013
Edit Thread
oni-link said:
dsgrue3 said:

They consider more things than just the image itself. If that's all you base your decision on, then you probably won't agree. They factor in many aspects including frame integrity, aliasing, etc.

They did conclude that Trine 2 looked better on Wii U so I don't understand what upsets you there. With SC it came down to whether you put an emphasis on visual beauty or integrity - if you prefer better textures with some tear then Wii U is not the best choice. If you prefer worse textures with no tear, then it is.


Their Trine 2 comparison never stated that Wii U version was better.  They reluctantly implied the Wii U's advantages but never stated it was better than the PS360 versions (just like NFS:MW).

"The Wii U version also deserves credit, of course. The game not only features many of the graphical upgrades found on the PC, but does so while delivering better image quality than the 360 and PS3 without compromising on the solid frame-rate."

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-trine-2-face-off

See, nothing to worry about.