Zero999 on 26 August 2013
| haxxiy said: Children should be obvious enough and for women, they are biologically more valuable than men. No, really. Women sire issue one or two at a time and take a long time to do so while men can impregnate multiple females at a time. It's much easier for a population to thrive with excess females than excess males. Take into account non-monogamous mammals, with a functioning breeding hierarchy, the chances you are less important as a male, statistically speaking, are higher. You could also argue those who made these rules were male themselves and perhaps unconsciously saw it as a way of curbing competition while preserving all these valuable females. Either way, the shadow of nature and evolutionary biology is still there. |
a sinking ship is no threat to the humanity total population.
