By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ninjablade on 26 August 2013
Edit Thread
zippy said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
once again a wiiu multi- platform game is on par with current gen, once again the same posters scream lazy ports

More than twice as much RAM. Textures not much better. Proof positive of laziness.


remember the ram is way slower then 360/ps3 ram, the only 3d game to take advantage is need for speed and its not exactly a fair comparison because its an ehnaced port that came out months later, the lazy port meme need sto be banned, especially when the majority of MP games are still inferior. 

What needs to be banned is you, and you have been, multiple times. Haven't you learned your lesson yet?


your right every dev is lazy cause they can't harness the hidden power from the wiiu, lets blame the devs not the hardware, because the hardware has secret hidden powers that can be unlocked by getting the console angry.



Errm.. the Wii U version is the one that runs in a higher resolution and has zero SCREEN TEARING!! also the Wii U version was the one that had the least development time, and still ended up the better version.My point being, that even a rushed Wii U port has managed to outperform current gen versions. Lets put this on par with current hardware to bed, Wii U is more powerful than currrent gen.


i think you need to get your facts right the wiiu version does not run at a higher resolution, they aslo say it has worst textures then the ps3 version, they go on to say  they think the wiiu version is best version because of no screen tearing, on par with each othere is perfect word for this comparsion they are very close to each othere and they excluded the 360 version cause they were to lazy to the install, i'm still waiting for DF for a much better comparison.