| oniyide said:
Forget Reggie's last name. I messed up, but my point stands. i never trusted anything his says unless it comes from the mouth of someone who has actually involved the making of the system...and even then. Again, that's your prerogative. I guess time will tell if he was lying or not.
No what i meant by the time they get to that point if they even do, it will not be new and it wont have much of an impact. Cause people might have gotten tired of waiting. Only a vast minority of people (at the moment anyway) are basing their WiiU purchase on the promise of two-gamepad play, so they're not really waiting to begin with.
SO its too expensive to sell on its own, fair enough. Thats no excuse to not have the system itself utilize two ESPECIALLY if someone who owns a WIi U can just take the tablet to a friend's house and use it their. Its not a luxury its common sense, I can take my PS3 controller and Wiimote and use it on my friends PS3 or Wii why cant I do that with the gamepad? makes no sense, not even use the functions just use it as an actually controller, IMHO this sends the wrong message. The problem is that Nintendo would be designing features in the game with the assumption that either the buyer has a friend that also has a WiiU or doesn't mind spending an additional $150 for these features just to support two players. To put it into perspective, the way Nintendoland launched you can spend the same amount of money for four Wii Remotes and have a total of five players as opposed to one additional Gamepad for only two players for the same price. |







