It pleases me to see people relying on something more than just reviewers to decide their gaming experience for them.
On a side note: Gamespot may own Gamefaqs but the two have different sets of reviewers. "Don't give me this whole, Gamespot owns Gamefaqs so they're the same when listed as the same source". How many of those 58 sources listed are owned by the same company or even owned by one another? By your logic that list should only be a third as long. I can point out at least six owned by Sony alone. So don't act like its justified to claim ignore Gamefaqs just because its owned by Gamespot when Metacritics has included every other little variant and deviation of each reviewer regardless who owns them. There's really no excuse for them not to include Gamefaqs as its own seperate source as it does its own seperate reviews and features independent user reviews.
If reviews really mean this much to Sony fans, they can have them, we'll gladly be satisfied with having the sales and fanbase.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
