By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Sky Render said:

And how many people would honestly care, do you suppose? Oh certainly, visual quality buffs would never settle for DVD when they could have Blu-Ray, but again, that's not the norm. The norm is a desire to have an optimal experience for the price, and visual quality factors in far less than the quality of the subject being portrayed (in this case, the movie itself).  In this market model, though the user would be willing to pay more for Blu-Ray than DVD, they would not be willing to pay as much more for it as a visual quality buff would. 


True, but if you use that argument, you have to do the same for gaming.  The Wii offers a great experience for its' price right now, as does the 360, and, for better or worse, the PS3.  It would be the same in this situation, if they had all the same features they have now but they all had the same games.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."