Lulz said:
Zero999 said:
Lulz said:
Zero999 said:
It's really simple. if he didn't had the right to arrest the other woman, then the woman in pink has the right to help. but regardless of that, she just made sure to remove his grip from the other woman and keep a distance between them. she didn't threaten his physical integrity but he punched her directly in the face for no reason. there's no way around it, HE MUST GO UNDER ARREST, period.
|
First, your punctuation and grammar are absolutely atrocious.
Second, and more importantly, you are 100% wrong. That cop had every righ to punch that woman in the face. He also had every right to place the first woman under arrest. They jay-walked. He decided to enforce the law. They decided to ignore him and try to brush past him. In what universe do you think that's how society should work? What exactly was the officer supposed to do? Follow behind them begging them very nicely to please stop so that he could do his job?
Don't be such a dunce.
If that's how the world worked how would any law be enforced? How could any police officer actually do his job if people that broke the rules were just allowed to walk away from him without him being able to retsrain the person?
In fact, that woman who tried to free her friend by putting her hands on the officer should have gotten more than a single punch to the face. Police officers carry guns, batons, and pepper spray on them at all times. You can't have disorderly civilians grabbing at them. I'm sure the women in pink didn't indend to grab his gun and use it, but can the cop actually take that chance? His safety is the priority in that situation. The safety of the woman who could potentially take one of his weapons and use it against him is an after thought.
|
do you have any cognitive problem? I made clear that i didn't know the reason of the arrest. that's why I said "if he didn't had the right to arrest the other woman" since i didn't know the reason. I also made clear that the reason of the arrest is irrelevant since I was talking about his agression.
bolded: WHAT?
bolded2: It would have been amazing to see her use telekinesis because that's the only way she could have grabbed his weapons with a distance between them. he was free to pepper spray her or even point his gun. yet he decided to close the distance between them and hurt her for free. way to go for a cop, right?
|
You're making a complete fool of yourself.
You keep babbling on incoherently about the officer's "aggression", as if a single punch to the face is some heinous assault against the moral fiber of civilized society. She put HIS life in danger by grabbing at him when he had at least 3 weapons on him. She's lucky he ONLY punched her in the face. If I were in his shoes I would have punched her a lot harder to make sure she didn't get back up and attack me again before I finished arresting her friend.
What kind of nonsensical tard-drivel are you spewing in regards to "telekinesis"? That's the "only" way she could have grabbed his gun considering the "distance between them"? What distance? She was physically assaulting him. She was fucking grabbing the cop you gonad gargling gargoyle. You can't get ANY closer than that unless she pried his mouth open and climbed inside of him!
Please just stop. You're making every person that reads your posts dumber.
|
go watch the video. she separetes him and the other woman and then pushes him and stays where she is, with a distance between the cop and her. he then closes the distance and punches her.
