By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lulz on 19 August 2013
Edit Thread
the-pi-guy said:
errorpwns said:
Subie_Greg said:
I prefer truth. Microsoft paid. It's easy to say and understand. It's no different than COD or BF... other than Titan Fall not being as big a franchise as those 2 are.


Basically what I hear from you is "Titanfall isn't on the PS4 SO MICROSOFT HAD TO HAVE PAID!" I'm sorry, but I bet if it was a PS4 exclusive you wouldn't even consider for a moment Sony paid. I don't even have interest in Titanfall or the Xbox One. Actually my next home console will be a PS4, but come on seriously? How biased do you have to get?

MS has a history of buying exclusivity, and Sony doesn't have any money. They are selling buildings just to stay in black.  

When a company doesn't give a reasonable answer when it comes to why it's exclusive, it's because they're being paid.  There is no reason at all, outside of being paid, for Titanfall to be exclusive.  

It has nothing to do with him being biased.  


Oh poor Sony. They don't have any monies!!! 

Any company that makes an exclusive for a console is being paid by that console maker. It's not like devs make games for Microsoft because MS pays them while Sony is somehow getting devs to make exclusives for their console because they're just really really nice guys that deserve to have exclusive given to them for free.

There is no reason for any game to be exclusive aside from money being paid. Period.

It's hilarious how people act like MS is doing something wrong just because they actually have money, and Sony gets a pass because they are almost in finacial ruin.