the-pi-guy said:
errorpwns said:
the-pi-guy said:
MS has a history of buying exclusivity, and Sony doesn't have any money. They are selling buildings just to stay in black.
When a company doesn't give a reasonable answer when it comes to why it's exclusive, it's because they're being paid. There is no reason at all, outside of being paid, for Titanfall to be exclusive.
It has nothing to do with him being biased.
|
How are servers not a legitimate reason? Do you understand how dense you sound right now? They gave legitimate reasons. And with a smaller company it is better to stick with one console ecosystem at first rather than spreading out to port onto every console in existance. I bet the main reason why it got a PC version in the first place was due to it being on the One and most likely easier to move over. If Microsoft had paid exclustivity money I doubt it'd be on the PC instantly. As a PC gamer I've had to wait multiple times due to Microsoft buying exclustivity. In some cases such as Fable2 I never got to see the game at all on the PC.
|
Servers aren't a legitimate reason, that can be done on PS4 also. PS4 is also very similar, architecture wise to the Xbox One and PC, in fact it might even be easier to move over, due to more similarities with PS4. What about Xbox 360? The 360 is powerful enough for Titanfall, but PS4 is not? Why isn't EA funding PS4 development?
|
What does console hardware have to do with getting dedicated servers or not? Your ignorance speaks volumes. When it comes to a multiplayer heavy game like titanfall servers matter. He stated he talked to both Sony and Microsoft and Microsoft most likely provided dedicated servers. So I guess in a sense that would be "buying exclutvitiy". In reality it isn't though as I'm sure Sony could have had the game provided they helped the company get dedicated servers set up.
