By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Imaginedvl on 19 August 2013
Edit Thread
the-pi-guy said:
errorpwns said:
Subie_Greg said:
I prefer truth. Microsoft paid. It's easy to say and understand. It's no different than COD or BF... other than Titan Fall not being as big a franchise as those 2 are.


Basically what I hear from you is "Titanfall isn't on the PS4 SO MICROSOFT HAD TO HAVE PAID!" I'm sorry, but I bet if it was a PS4 exclusive you wouldn't even consider for a moment Sony paid. I don't even have interest in Titanfall or the Xbox One. Actually my next home console will be a PS4, but come on seriously? How biased do you have to get?

MS has a history of buying exclusivity, and Sony doesn't have any money. They are selling buildings just to stay in black.  

When a company doesn't give a reasonable answer when it comes to why it's exclusive, it's because they're being paid.  There is no reason at all, outside of being paid, for Titanfall to be exclusive.  

It has nothing to do with him being biased.  

I'm sorry but nothing in what you said (bolded) is a proof of Microsoft paying for the exclusivity.

This is just assumptions, mainly stated by Microsoft hates who jump on any occasion to bash them :)
Everything Microsoft or any related are saying are basically being bashed by haters from day one... It is not new at all and we can go back years ago about that.

The funny part is that 99% of these Internet experts knows basicaly NOTHING about how it is hard/easy/friendly to work with either Sony or Microsoft. And we can see these kind of comment coming from both side. The only one actually arguing and "knowing" what is true or not; are the clueless people of the internet forums... (IE: us)

I do not know if Microsoft paid them or not by the way... But just because you do not agree with what Titanfall devs are saying does not mean Microsoft paied them.