By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
the-pi-guy said:
errorpwns said:
Subie_Greg said:
I prefer truth. Microsoft paid. It's easy to say and understand. It's no different than COD or BF... other than Titan Fall not being as big a franchise as those 2 are.


Basically what I hear from you is "Titanfall isn't on the PS4 SO MICROSOFT HAD TO HAVE PAID!" I'm sorry, but I bet if it was a PS4 exclusive you wouldn't even consider for a moment Sony paid. I don't even have interest in Titanfall or the Xbox One. Actually my next home console will be a PS4, but come on seriously? How biased do you have to get?

MS has a history of buying exclusivity, and Sony doesn't have any money. They are selling buildings just to stay in black.  

When a company doesn't give a reasonable answer when it comes to why it's exclusive, it's because they're being paid.  There is no reason at all, outside of being paid, for Titanfall to be exclusive.  

It has nothing to do with him being biased.  


How are servers not a legitimate reason? Do you understand how dense you sound right now? They gave legitimate reasons. And with a smaller company it is better to stick with one console ecosystem at first rather than spreading out to port onto every console in existance. I bet the main reason why it got a PC version in the first place was due to it being on the One and most likely easier to move over. If Microsoft had paid exclustivity money I doubt it'd be on the PC instantly. As a PC gamer I've had to wait multiple times due to Microsoft buying exclustivity. In some cases such as Fable2 I never got to see the game at all on the PC.