Boutros said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
Boutros said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
Boutros said:
Yeah I didn't mean full change just maybe bring more action in the combat system. I love turn-based but sometimes change is good.
Look at Paper Mario: Sticker Star. It's not the traditional gameplay of other Paper Mario games. It tried something else and something new and I liked that.
|
You have to understand that your personal take on a game does not dictate how good or bad it is. You can like bad games just like how you can hate good ones. |
That's actually exactly what you did when you said "Because they're the far superior games, and as we all know, quality is what sells!".
It's only your personal take that they're far superior games.
We're all just sharing our opinions here.
|
If X has everything Y does but more and better, then X is overall better than Y. A $10 bill is greater than a $5 bill. Are you denying all this? |
I'm not denying that 10$ is more than 5$ lol but I if I have played X before playing Y and Y is only slightly better than X than it most likely won't be enough for me to think Y is better than X.
Just look at Pokémon Yellow, Crystal, Emerald and Platinum. All of those games are everything their sister titles were but with added content and none of them are better than their sister game. Are you denying that? |
No need to get all cute, but no I'm not denying that as it isn't true in the first place seeing as you even explained yourself why Yellow/Crystal/etc. are better. Again, this isn't a race! Being first =/= being better. There is simply no sense in that other than for nostalgia which can apply to anything. It's all about doing more and doing old things better. Why can't you understand this! D:
